Subject: | Re: Hello, Thank You, a short (?) introduction - parabolas |
---|---|
From: | madl74 |
Date: | Sun Feb 16, 2014 6:37 pm ((PST)) |
> We'll focus them on the same point a few hundred feet away, and make a mu= lti-track recording of some noise passes. Dan, That would be very interesting especially with a reasonably constant sound= source which is why I shake peanuts. :-) The Wildtronic recordings I've heard so far have all been over-recorded wit= h peak limiting and with auto level control actively "pumping" and sometimes= even with peak enharmonic (grumbling) distortion. Some parts are free of these effects, but I'll keep banging on about how you don't need to record= anywhere near 100%. I was listening at -12dBs and checking audible cross-modulation distortion with audiograms. I'm curious about the quoted 4dB noise figure - compared with what? It can'= t be with free air as it isn't in free air. It's in a higher impedance environment. Does the thermal noise of the air also get amplified by the parabola? David Brinicombe |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Hello, Thank You, a short (?) introduction - parabolas, Dan Dugan |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Hello, Thank You, a short (?) introduction - parabolas, Gerrit |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Hello, Thank You, a short (?) introduction - parabolas, Dan Dugan |
Next by Thread: | Re: Hello, Thank You, a short (?) introduction - parabolas, Gerrit |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU