naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: NR and echoes

Subject: Re: NR and echoes
From: "Scott Fraser" scottbfraser
Date: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:04 am ((PDT))
< How do you all reduce noise in a recording that has echoes?
The first thing that disappear when reducing noise is the echo of the sounds. 
At least it feels like that... :) >

A couple things to note. Firstly, in the 1970s testing showed that the absence 
of tape hiss was interpreted by the brain as a lack of ambience. This is 
because ambience is displaced in time from the original sound event. Beyond a 
certain time threshold, the brain hears the ambience (reverberation) as 
uncorrelated to the sound source. Tape hiss, being uncorrelated, i.e. totally 
random, is felt to be part of the reverberation, & removing it made recordings 
appear to be drier than non-noise reduced recordings. As a result engineers did 
their monitoring of the complete encode-record-mix/process-playback-decode 
signal chain when adding reverberation.
Secondly, modern, advanced noise reduction algorithms allow the user to steer 
the process to effect the desired frequency ranges. The user can aim the NR 
process at the most audible noise, leaving the remainder of the spectrum 
untouched. Also, a couple passes of 5dB noise reduction tends to be more 
transparent than a single pass of 10dB reduction.

Scott Fraser








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU