| Subject: | Re: Winter recording suggestions? + Olympus LS-100 Review |
|---|---|
| From: | "jimfrost.peel" jimfrost.peel |
| Date: | Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:42 am ((PDT)) |
I'd certainly be interested in your review of the LS-100. I've been toying = with getting the LS-14 or the LS-100 for a while now. The LS-100 probably b= eing overkill for what I want (Currently using an OM-D HD-SLR using the in-= built mikes and needing "better quality"). It's my first post but I've already learnt a lot from just reading through = the forums here. Cheers, Jim m43.im --- In "ndbdxr" <> wrote: > I'll be attempting my first full review of a device which is *not* a bat = detector: The LS-100 from Olympus, should be arriving any day now. > It seems to be quite capable. I hope that I'll be able to add some useful= information on it. > > Best regards, > -Al > http://batdetecting.blogspot.com/ > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Thrush recording, John Brenneman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Winter recording suggestions? + Olympus LS-100 Review, ndbdxr |
| Previous by Thread: | Winter recording suggestions? + Olympus LS-100 Review, ndbdxr |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Winter recording suggestions? + Olympus LS-100 Review, ndbdxr |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU