Hi Jim,
Thank you. Yes, this Group is the best! Not only is it chock-full-of great =
(and relevant) info; but some of the *Best* Sound Recordists are Members he=
re. World renowned Experts.
It's a lot of fun to read posts from the Experts :) They are like celebriti=
es that pop-up here :)
I've found lots of great info here for my wildlife recording notebook (my p=
ersonal notes). Great opinions on equipment, etc.
As for my up-coming review of the LS-100, I hope you find it useful. My goa=
l, is to provide some interesting insights, etc. that other reviews may hav=
e missed. There are quite a few reviews of this unit on the Web already...S=
o, it won't be easy!
Best regards,
-Al
--- In "jimfrost.peel" <> wrote:
>
> I'd certainly be interested in your review of the LS-100. I've been toyin=
g with getting the LS-14 or the LS-100 for a while now. The LS-100 probably=
being overkill for what I want (Currently using an OM-D HD-SLR using the i=
n-built mikes and needing "better quality").
>
> It's my first post but I've already learnt a lot from just reading throug=
h the forums here.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jim
>
> m43.im
>
> --- In "ndbdxr" <ndbdxr@> wrote:
>
> > I'll be attempting my first full review of a device which is *not* a ba=
t detector: The LS-100 from Olympus, should be arriving any day now.
> > It seems to be quite capable. I hope that I'll be able to add some usef=
ul information on it.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > -Al
> > http://batdetecting.blogspot.com/
> >
>
|