Subject: | Re: speaking of fetch |
---|---|
From: | "Avocet" madl74 |
Date: | Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:56 pm ((PDT)) |
> My problem with your proposed ranking system is that it falls apart > unless all of the mics being ranked have similar self-noise > characteristics. John, Noise is nothing to do with sound perspective. That's why I go by ear. Forget noises. What I am listening to is similar to the different perspectives of camera lenses. To risk taking the analogy too far, a cardioid is like a fisheye lens, a short gunmic is a wide angle lens, and a rifle mic is like a standard 50mm lens. Stereo is very fuzzy Cinemascope. :-) David David Brinicombe North Devon, UK Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum - Ambrose Bierce |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: speaking of fetch, Avocet |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: speaking of fetch, rock_scallop |
Previous by Thread: | Re: speaking of fetch, Avocet |
Next by Thread: | Re: speaking of fetch, rock_scallop |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU