Subject: | speaking of fetch |
---|---|
From: | "rock_scallop" rock_scallop |
Date: | Sun Mar 10, 2013 10:36 am ((PDT)) |
David, Does a discussion of "fetch" deserve a separate thread? Description of how differences between microphones translate to a the recor= ding locations is an interesting topic - to me anyway. While your system of= comparative ranking might prove useful, I think polar graphs might also be= useful to describe how a microphone or array can translate a soundscape or= fetch a specific sound. Traditional polar frequency graphs found in specs = for microphones are somewhat helpful but they to not easily relate the prac= tical distances on a nature recording location. John Hartog rockscallop.org |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Tascam DR-100 MKII (with Rode NTG2) records at extremely low vol, Eric Fassbender |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: speaking of fetch, Avocet |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Tascam DR-100 MKII (with Rode NTG2) records at extremely low vol, Robin |
Next by Thread: | Re: speaking of fetch, Avocet |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU