Subject: | Re: Most useful microphones for nature recording. |
---|---|
From: | "Eric Benjamin" ericbenjamin2 |
Date: | Fri Mar 8, 2013 12:51 pm ((PST)) |
> I do not see how that effects comparable perceived distances. The interesting thing here is that our principle method of judging distance with our hearing is to estimate the amount of direct sound relative to the reverberant sound. All of this happens more or less without our conscious intervention. The sound source is simply observed to sound as though it is near or far. There can be substantial reverberant sound in natural environments. Eric Benjamin |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Most useful microphones for nature recording., rock_scallop |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Nature Recordists] Most useful microphones for nature recording., rock_scallop |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Most useful microphones for nature recording., rock_scallop |
Next by Thread: | Re: Most useful microphones for nature recording., Avocet |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU