naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: tripods

Subject: Re: tripods
From: "Peter Shute" pshute2
Date: Wed Feb 27, 2013 11:24 am ((PST))
The Goodies always said string was reliable. But what do you do about the k=
nife? Can't take that on a plane anymore.=0D
=0D
Peter Shute=0D
=0D
=0D
--------------------------=0D
Sent using BlackBerry=0D
=0D
________________________________=0D
From: =0D
To: =0D
Sent: Thu Feb 28 05:46:31 2013=0D
Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] Re: tripods=0D
=0D
=0D
=0D
Hi Peter=0D
Well no you don't, and I do the same as you with my parallel (a la Rob Dani=
elson) rig. I use one of these (see link below) which I picked up new for =
=A310 a few years ago, one of best buys I've ever had. The build quality is=
 superb; equally as good if not better than my Manfrottos. The legs can be =
splayed for unshakeable stability (I use it for macro photography), and it =
comes with case and tools. BUT due to it's weight, I wouldn't take it on a =
plane, I'd take string.=0D
Cheers=0D
Max=0D
=0D
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/B00193YD32/ref=3Dmw_dp_img?is=3Dl=0D
=0D
Sent from my iPod=0D
=0D
On 27 Feb 2013, at 17:30, Peter Shute <pshute%40nuw=
.org.au>> wrote:=0D
=0D
> Do you need a head on the tripod at all? I ended up removing mine, saving=
 a lot of weight, and I screw the SASS straight on. It's handy to be able t=
o adjust the legs on uneven ground, so it's better than the three sticks.=
=0D
>=0D
> Peter Shute=0D
>=0D
> Sent from my iPad=0D
>=0D
> On 28/02/2013, at 12:14 AM, "Max Catterwell" <mailt=
o:maxcatterwell%40o2.co.uk><maxcatterwell%40o2=
.co.uk>>> wrote:=0D
>=0D
>=0D
>=0D
> Hi Nick=0D
> Yes, me too. I have some fairly hefty astronomical scopes, in addition to=
 my birding scopes. These are virtually indispensable for their purpose, bu=
t the requirements for supporting a mic would in no way come close to this =
category. If people don't like the idea of sticks, they can pick up small t=
ripods with pan and tilt heads for ten or fifteen quid that are much more t=
han adequate for the purpose. All I would say is, unless you're overloaded =
with cash, don't waste your money.=0D
> Cheers=0D
> Max=0D
>=0D
> Sent from my iPod=0D
>=0D
> On 27 Feb 2013, at 12:41, Nick Dando <ni=
ck.dando%40btopenworld.com>> wrote:=0D
>=0D
>> I do have another use for the tripod; supporting a rather unwieldy 4x5 v=
iew camera.=0D
>>=0D
>> Nick=0D
>>=0D
>> Sent from my iPhone=0D
>>=0D
>> On 27 Feb 2013, at 09:52, Max Catterwell <m=
axcatterwell%40o2.co.uk>> wrote:=0D
>>=0D
>>> Hi all=0D
>>> I have admit this thread has me very worried. It seems that consumerism=
 has run rampant over all of it. Why anybody would spend the vast sums of m=
oney being talked about here, on something so basic as a tripod, is beyond =
me. It's gadgetry gone mad. I don't dispute the necessity of a tripod for u=
sing a telescope on for example; I have a few I've collected over the years=
, but for supporting a mic? May I propose to the honourable members the sim=
ple expedient of a pocket knife and piece of string? Cut three lengths of w=
ithy about a foot longer than the required height, this being the point at =
which point you bind them together. Splay the legs apart and rest mic/zep i=
n between the crutch formed on top; job done. If you leave 2-3 feet of stri=
ng running from the seizing, you can loop this over the mic/zep to hold in =
place if required. You don't need the excellent Ashley Book of Knots (one o=
f the best things that ever came out of America) to do this job, it's simpl=
icity itself.=0D
>>> I await derision=0D
>>> Max=0D
>>>=0D
>>> Sent from my iPod=0D
>>>=0D
>>> On 27 Feb 2013, at 08:58, "sounds.images" <mailt=
o:sounds.images%40yahoo.com>> wrote:=0D
>>>=0D
>>>>=0D
>>>> I have recommended the Manfrotto 5001B Nano stand. It is actually a ph=
otographic light stand but goes from 49 to 190cm so easy to transport and s=
mall enough to be part of hand luggage if flying.=0D
>>>> I agree Slik and Benro are a cheaper alternative if you want a tripod =
although worth looking at Giottos too.=0D
>>>>=0D
>>>>=0D
>>>> --- In <naturerecordists%40yaho=
ogroups.com>, "Chris Harrison" wrote:=0D
>>>>>=0D
>>>>> I don't think I would ever shell out Gitzo money for a tripod for a=
=0D
>>>>> microphone.=0D
>>>>> You can get some decent small carbon fiber tripods from companies lik=
e Slik=0D
>>>>> or Benro for around US$100.=0D
>>>>>=0D
>>>>> Chris=0D
>>>>>=0D
>>>>=0D
>>>>=0D
>>>>=0D
>>>>=0D
>>>> ------------------------------------=0D
>>>>=0D
>>>> "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a=0D
>>>> sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krau=
se.=0D
>>>>=0D
>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links=0D
>>>>=0D
>>>>=0D
>>>>=0D
>>>=0D
>>=0D
>>=0D
>>=0D
>>=0D
>>=0D
>> ------------------------------------=0D
>>=0D
>> "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a=0D
>> sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause=
.=0D
>>=0D
>> Yahoo! Groups Links=0D
>>=0D
>>=0D
>>=0D
>=0D
>=0D
>=0D
>=0D
> ------------------------------------=0D
>=0D
> "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a=0D
> sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.=
=0D
>=0D
> Yahoo! Groups Links=0D
>=0D
>=0D
>=0D
=0D
=0D
=0D
=0D









<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU