naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xeno-canto developments

Subject: Re: xeno-canto developments
From: "Dan Dugan" dandugan_1999
Date: Mon Jan 21, 2013 8:05 pm ((PST))
> And example I've recently come across is Little Button-quail (I think). T=
hey're around 400Hz, so hard to see at the bottom of the image if the scale=
 goes up to 15kHz, and the call is long and slow. If the horizontal scale i=
s too stretched out they appear on the spectrogram almost as a horizontal l=
ine, but if a more compressed scale is used (about a minute per screen widt=
h) then they become very obvious little horse-shoe shapes.

The XC example used a linear frequency scale on the vertical axis. This is =
great for high-frequency insects and birds but compresses lower frequencies=
 to the point of invisibility. It's kind of a left-over from early spectrog=
ram technology, but academic people are used to it and consider it to be th=
e the standard method. A spectrogram with a dB (log) vertical axis shows th=
e full range in proportion.

-Dan





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU