naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xeno-canto developments

Subject: Re: xeno-canto developments
From: "wimmel3" wimmel3
Date: Mon Jan 21, 2013 1:42 pm ((PST))
hello Peter,

> I'm glad to hear that these kinds of things are being planned. But >what =
exactly is meant by "draw a box around a signal"? If you mean drawing on a =
spectrogram then I'm certainly in favour of that.

Not completely sure what Elias meant of course, but I took it to mean exact=
ly that. One of the obvious uses would be to annotate different species or =
sound types in a recording.

> Where do the spectrograms I see on Xeno Canto come from? Are they auto ge=
nerated.

They are generated by the web server during uploading.

> How would you deal with spectrograms for half hour recordings?

Half an hour is a bit extreme, but the problem is not so much in generating=
 them I think, but in the presentation.
That will have to be tackled before the annotation.
Here is an example of a long spectrogram: http://www.xeno-canto.org/sounds/=
uploaded/WOEAFQRMUD/ffts/XC62894-full.png

> Are you encouraging the uploading of ambient recordings with lots of spec=
ies in them?

Oh yes. Especially if you know which species can be heard. Such recordings =
bind the collection together nicely. Of course to upload them you would nee=
d to be able to identify at least one species :-) The recording belonging t=
o the long sonogram I just mentioned, notes  a number of "background specie=
s": www.xeno-canto.org/62894

WP








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU