Subject: | Re: New Telinga PIP Stereo preamp. & EIN |
---|---|
From: | "John Crockett" naturalcontemplative |
Date: | Mon Jan 21, 2013 9:06 am ((PST)) |
But that doesn't take into account the gain in the first preamp, does it? J= ust summing the squares and taking the square root makes it look like the e= nd result is determined by the noisiest thing in the chain. But clearly you= can put a quiet preamp in front of a noisy one and get a better end result= than if you just go directly into the noisy preamp. That's what this devic= e is for, right? Or am I so confused now that I do not have any idea what I am talking about= ?!! If so, I'll just go away and do some recording. John --- In "Robin" wrote: > > John Crockett wrote: > > > what is the correct way to calculate the total > > noise at the end of this chain? > > Square each value, sum, then take the square root. This and other calcula= tions may be found in a Python script I uploaded to the Files section of th= is group. Look for "EINcalculations.py" in the "Member Files" folder. > > -- Robin Parmar > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: New Telinga PIP Stereo preamp. & EIN, Robin |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: New Telinga PIP Stereo preamp. & EIN, John Crockett |
Previous by Thread: | Re: New Telinga PIP Stereo preamp. & EIN, Robin |
Next by Thread: | Re: New Telinga PIP Stereo preamp. & EIN, John Crockett |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU