naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: New Telinga PIP Stereo preamp. & EIN

Subject: Re: New Telinga PIP Stereo preamp. & EIN
From: "John Crockett" naturalcontemplative
Date: Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:06 pm ((PST))
I think I have answered my questions to my own satisfaction.

John

--- In  "John Crockett"  wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> I had sort of figured that out sitting here thinking about it. So EIN is =
not the way to talk about it. But I do note that when I engage the -20 dB s=
ensitivity switch on my H2, the H2 noise level drops by 20 dB. If I didn't =
have an external preamp, the signal would also drop by 20 dB. but with an e=
xternal preamp providing the gain, now the recorder noise has dropped but t=
he signal level is still high.
>
> What I am still unsure about is exactly how to quantify this. How to calc=
ulate the amount of noise at the end of the chain when you have microphone =
output noise, preamp 1 EIN and preamp 2 EIN.
>
> I mean, if one just uses the EIN for each preamp in the calculation, ther=
e appears to be no advantage to using an external preamp with lower noise a=
nd feeding it into a recorder preamp with higher noise. Yet I can see by pr=
actical application, that if I feed a quieter preamp into my Zoom H2, and I=
 engage the -20 dB pad on the H2, I get a much better result than if I feed=
 the same mic directly into the H2 without the -20 dB pad.
>
> It appears to me that the numbers give an accurate prediction of the resu=
lt if I pretend that the EIN of the H2 is now -120 dB instead of being -100=
 dB.
>
> But you seem to be saying that is wrong, so what is the correct way to ca=
lculate the total noise at the end of this chain?
>
> Am I making any sense?
>
> John
>
>
>
> --- In  "Avocet"  wrote:
> >
> > > For example, if your H4n has an EIN of -107 (at full gain), and
> > > adding your preamp to the chain allows you to reduce the gain on the
> > > H4n by 35 dB, does that mean the EIN of the H4n has now been reduced
> > > to -142 dB? I'm really not sure I am understanding this correctly!
> >
> > John,
> >
> > No. The Equivalent Input Noise takes any gain setting into account.
> > Another way to define EIN is the input level which would increase the
> > audible noise by 3 dB (twice the energy level)
> >
> > The measured EIN should stay constant whatever the gain settings, but
> > if not, the lowest EIN should be that measured at high gain. If EIN
> > goes up with gain, there is extra noise in the recorder. This sounds
> > odd but you subtract the gain, so the EIN should stay the same.
> >
> > Another way of looking at this is putting a 10dB attenuator on the
> > input. The noise level will be the same, but relative to the overall
> > gain the EIN will be 10dB higher.
> >
> > The EIN of a line input could be quite high, but that would normally
> > be swamped by the higher input level going into the line input. What
> > the Telinga preamp does with PIP inputs is to swamp any recorder EIN
> > which can be quite high with "affordable" recorders.
> >
> > What makes EIN difficult to pin down is different noise frequency
> > profiles, for instance adding LF noise to HF noise. That is why
> > weighting is used to make measurementrs more standard.
> >
> > Hope this helps.
> >
> > David
> >
> > David Brinicombe
> > North Devon, UK
> > Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum - Ambrose Bierce
> >
>








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU