naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Olympus LS-14 initial thoughts

Subject: Re: Olympus LS-14 initial thoughts
From: "ambient_jungle" ambient_jungle
Date: Sat Jan 5, 2013 1:07 pm ((PST))
I agree with you on several accounts...

First I have the LS-11 and would completely happy with this if it could rec=
ord down to 20hz. I recently picked up a sony pcm m10 and tested the LS-11 =
side by side. Overall I thought the LS-11 produced more realistic sounds th=
en the m10 (I kind of think Sony hardwired some EQ settings internally to m=
ake it sound like the preamp on those things are so quite, because I notice=
s some of the highs were not being picked up as easily as it was with the L=
S=3D11. That said, I did pick up some natural lower ambient sounds that I w=
ould of liked to include in my recordings, but didn't got those sounds beca=
use of the limitation of the LS-11 only able to go to 60hz.

I also agree with companies taking cheaper steps backwards than going forwa=
rd hurts their products. I love LS-11 design and quality. The Ls-14, felt l=
ike a toy almost. All plastic. It felt like Olympus threw in some whistles =
and bells, like the tuner and such and then skimped on quality to save a fe=
w bucks in the cost of production of the product.

--- In  "Robin"  wrote:
>
> As far as I am concerned the Holy Grail of recording is already here... t=
he LS-10/11/5. Why do people expect anything better at this low price? Most=
 of us must remember the Sony Pro Walkman, the horrible DAT technology, and=
 so on. What we have now is so much better in terms of overall sound qualit=
y, portability, and usability that it's a constant amazement to me.
>
> (If we want better we can spend more and suffer a larger recorder.)
>
> Yes, it's a shame the LS-14 hasn't made incremental improvements, but I a=
m far from surprised. With each new iteration, companies learn to compromis=
e and use cheaper parts and wider tolerances. Certainly Olympus demonstrate=
s this. For example, the PEN E-P1 was an excellent little camera with a nov=
el lens mount and cute look. Then they issued a constant stream of new mode=
ls (ten?) with only incremental improvements, until the OMD line several ye=
ars later -- finally a real difference. I now expect to see another ten mod=
els that exist only due to the marketing department.
>
> They are doing the same with their recorders. It's a matter of one step f=
orward and two back. I am happy for the step forward and suffer the rest as=
 a symptom of late capitalism.
>
> -- Robin Parmar
>








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU