naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

3. Re: iRig pre

Subject: 3. Re: iRig pre
From: "vickipowys" vpowys
Date: Sun Dec 2, 2012 8:15 pm ((PST))
Thanks Marco!

I listened to your clip, there is no difference between Line In and  
Mic In with the settings you used.


Mark said of the iRig Pre:

> I believe what people are excited about is the ability to add XLR  
> to unequipped, small, inexpensive recorders.

Yes I agree Mark, a useful inexpensive gadget that might get more  
people recording (and listening more intently) to wildlife sounds.   
IRig seems great for phones and who knows what else.


Vicki




On 02/12/2012, at 7:28 PM,  wrote:

>
>
> Hi Vicki,
> here  http://soundcloud.com/marco-pesente/irig-pre-line-in-vs-mic- 
> in-on is what you asked for!
>
> cheers,
>
> Marco Pesente
>
>
> --- In  vickipowys  
> <> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Marco,
>>
>> That's a good test!  I'm not hearing much difference between the two
>> sound samples.
>>
>> So the preamp of the iRig doesn't really do anything, compared to
>> just adding a phantom power source, for small flash card recorders.
>>
>> Another question though, is there a difference in sound quality for
>> iRig when using LINE IN vs MIC IN?
>>
>> cheers,
>>
>> Vicki
>>







<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU