> But if one already owns a portable 2-channel P48 power supply (like
> the ART Phantom II)
>
Absolutely, and stereo is key here, although I found my 48 power supply bulky
and If I want to capture a sound quickly, it wouldn't be nearly as handy as the
iRig pre. Right now, I live in Saigon with an epidemic level drive-by thief
ridden urban area, that I wouldn't even feel safe enough to pull out a cell
phone, much less anything as big as my 48, but talking (hot house) apples
compared to nature.
Best,
Mark
On Dec 2, 2012, at 9:21 PM, John Crockett <> wrote:
> > Was thinking, if the iRig didn't do anything, would be a good thing!
> >
>
> But if one already owns a portable 2-channel P48 power supply (like
> the ART Phantom II), there is no advantage to purchasing the iRig.
> Raimund's test suggests that one would be better off using the P48
> supply with the recorder's preamps, if one owns the LS-10/11, PCM-M10
> or other recorder with comparable preamp quality.
>
> That's what I am doing while I save pennies for a Sound Devices preamp.
>
> John
>
> > 1.5. Re: iRig pre
> > Posted by: "Mark" seoulgypsy
> > Date: Sat Dec 1, 2012 9:14 pm ((PST))
> >
> > Hi Vicky,
> >
> > Was thinking, if the iRig didn't do anything, would be a good thing!
> >
> > I believe what people are excited about is the ability to add XLR
> > to unequipped, small, inexpensive recorders.
> >
> > Personally love that something that wasn't designed for these
> > purposes are beginning to have enough quality built in them to be
> > seriously used.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Mark
>
> John Crockett
>
> Let us live in harmony with Earth
> And all creatures
> That our lives may be a blessing
>
>
>
|