> I'm always interested when practice doesn't follow theory because
> theory should follow reality. Have you got a recording of "soft calls"
> with different settings so I can hear what's happening? Don't tell me
> and see if I can hear the difference. :-)
David,
I think that this observation still meets theory. We discussed this issue h=
ere many times (for instance at http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/naturer=
ecordists/message/38171).
To summarize it, the SENSE HIGH, LEVEL 2 setting will first attenuate the i=
ncoming signal and then amplify it again by the same amount, which is cours=
e nonsense (the intermediate very low signal level in the signal chain will=
then degrade the noise performance).
The SENSE LOW, LEVEL 10 setting on the other hand will just bypass this use=
less additional attenuation and subsequent amplification.
Regards,
Raimund
"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/
<*> Your email settings:
Digest Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|