Subject: | Re: iRig pre |
---|---|
From: | "Avocet" madl74 |
Date: | Sun Nov 25, 2012 5:13 pm ((PST)) |
> For practical wildlife sound recording purposes LOW sense volume 10 > gives a good result, and it was Raimund who originally pointed this > out. i.e. you get lower noise using low-10 and increasing the > levels by up to 5 dB in post, than you do with using high-5. Depends > what you are recording though, for soft calls a high sense setting > may be more appropriate. Vicki, I'm always interested when practice doesn't follow theory because theory should follow reality. Have you got a recording of "soft calls" with different settings so I can hear what's happening? Don't tell me and see if I can hear the difference. :-) David David Brinicombe North Devon, UK Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum - Ambrose Bierce |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: iRig pre, symmerista |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: iRig pre, vickipowys |
Previous by Thread: | Re: iRig pre, symmerista |
Next by Thread: | Re: iRig pre, vickipowys |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU