Subject: | Re: iRig pre |
---|---|
From: | "vickipowys" vpowys |
Date: | Sun Nov 25, 2012 12:36 pm ((PST)) |
Max, For practical wildlife sound recording purposes LOW sense volume 10 gives a good result, and it was Raimund who originally pointed this out. i.e. you get lower noise using low-10 and increasing the levels by up to 5 dB in post, than you do with using high-5. Depends what you are recording though, for soft calls a high sense setting may be more appropriate. Vicki On 25/11/2012, at 12:38 PM, Max wrote: > One thing that has me slightly confused is, that on one side I see > that Raimund gives the quietest setting for the LS-10 at maximum > gain on HIGH sense setting, and yet I'm sure I recall Vicky saying > that in her opinion maximum gain on LOW setting produced the best > results? Admittedly there is only 1dbu between Raimund's max gain > HIGH and LOW sense settings, so it's a mute point. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: iRig pre, Avocet |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: iRig pre, symmerista |
Previous by Thread: | Re: iRig pre, Avocet |
Next by Thread: | Re: iRig pre, symmerista |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU