naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Avlex M-S mic

Subject: Re: Avlex M-S mic
From: "Max" oatcruncher
Date: Mon Nov 12, 2012 6:18 pm ((PST))
Very strange!!! I added my reply to Keith on the end of my previous post, b=
ut once again it wouldn't send. So I deleted it, and off it went???? I'll t=
ry adding it here, but I'm not hopeful.
No, it won't go!?
I'll try posting under a new title
Max



--- In  "Max" <> wrote:
>
> Hi David,
> I'm having great difficulty posting this evening; I've been trying to rep=
ly to Keith for hours without success. I'll post my reply to him on the end=
 of this, just in case.
> OK, I appreciate your reply and the extra input you've given. One thing I=
'm assuming about this mic, is that the decoding is done internally. At thi=
s point in time my technical knowledge is limited, but as there's no mentio=
n of having to decode, I'm guessing it won't need to be done. In a way I ho=
pe it DOES have to be done, because it would be something to learn and play=
 with in Audition! But as I've said already, I'm not really expecting much =
for such a dirt cheap mic, but it was the m/s spec that rather intrigued me=
. Time will tell.
> Cheers
> Max
>
>
> --- In  "Avocet" <brini@> wrote:
> >
> > > What do YOU make of the specs? It's so cheap that I'm tempted to buy
> > > one whatever, to try with my LS-10.
> >
> > Max,
> >
> > It is likely to be value for money, take that as you will. :-) As a
> > kickabout mic or for putting on idents, fine, but don't expect much
> > with those specs.
> >
> > The stated noise level is high, whatever weighting is used but I would
> > have thought that they would have stated A-weighting if that is what
> > they mean. Witn no info, I'd expect a "best case" test. They are
> > unlikely to publish a "worst case" test.
> >
> > The output worries me at 5.6mV/Pa which is low for any mic. With quiet
> > sounds like nature recording, the input noise of any affordable
> > recorder will probably be audible, even over the 25dB mic spec.
> >
> > As a music mic, the max SPL of 110 dB rules it out for close miking of
> > instruments or even voices. It may be bad for handling noise and prone
> > to wind as well due to the fig-8 reponse.
> >
> > You can't easily separate out the M cardioid capsule so you will
> > always have an all-round pickup from the fig-8.
> >
> > David
> >
> > David Brinicombe
> > North Devon, UK
> > Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum - Ambrose Bierce
> >
>








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU