Subject: | Re: FLAC for Archive? |
---|---|
From: | "Marc Myers" primatemarc |
Date: | Fri Jul 27, 2012 6:56 am ((PDT)) |
Best today to think of archiving as a process rather than a media. It would= be great if we could rely on CDs but the formulations change over time, ev= en from the same brand and company. We have only the word of the manufactur= er that their media is archival anyway. What they profess is their best gue= ss. I am not confident that there will be a CD player or a USB port or an o= perating system that supports PCIe in thirty years even if the media holds = up. I've two boxes of floppy discs and a shelf of U-matic video tape to sub= mit as evidence of my concern. Better one archives by having a backup strat= egy so there's always duplicate copies and those duplicates are periodicall= y tested and migrated to new media. These days "new media" may also mean cl= oud solutions. Marc |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Tascam DR-05 and ME66?, robin_parmar_sound |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: FLAC for Archive?, Tim Dekle |
Previous by Thread: | Re: FLAC for Archive?, Ray Mansell |
Next by Thread: | Re: FLAC for Archive?, Tim Dekle |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU