Subject: | Re: FLAC for Archive? |
---|---|
From: | "Ray Mansell" BCTess |
Date: | Thu Jul 26, 2012 7:20 pm ((PDT)) |
Re FLAC vs. WAV vs MP3, etc.. Since these are simply definitions of the bit structures that comprise the recorded sounds, then there really is no concept of longevity. As long as you know the structure, you can write software to decode it, and I'm pretty sure those definitions will be around for a very long time, even if nobody actually uses them any more. As you stated, the medium on which the structures are stored is the crucial question. I have a pile of unused 80-column punched cards here, if anybody is interested :-) Ray On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Avocet <> wrote: > ** > > > I'm sticking to 320Kbs MP3 which will last much longer than I will, > and I bet nobody will tell the difference in quality from WAV. MP3 is > so ubiquitous that it is probably the best bet for long term storage > of compressed files. > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: FLAC for Archive?, Peter Shute |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Buzzards, Jim Lee |
Previous by Thread: | Re: FLAC for Archive?, Peter Shute |
Next by Thread: | Re: FLAC for Archive?, Marc Myers |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU