Subject: | Re: cable for long xlr microphone cables |
---|---|
From: | "Jez" tempjez |
Date: | Thu Jun 21, 2012 2:03 pm ((PDT)) |
indeed - that was one of the reasons I first thought it was odd. I can't re= ally work out why its been used. ta. --- In Julian Baldwin <= > wrote: > > Jez, > I have no idea which type of braided screening (aluminium or copper) > works best as I have never encountered cable with aluminium braided > screening. Its lack of popularity in the past may perhaps be explained > by a greater likelihood of fatiguing when repeatedly flexed. > However the clincher for me in deciding which type of cable to use would= > be the difficulty of attaching aluminium braiding to the XLR plugs. > Soldering aluminium is somewhat more difficult than soldering copper. > > Julian > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: cable for long xlr microphone cables, Julian Baldwin |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: cable for long xlr microphone cables, vickipowys |
Previous by Thread: | Re: cable for long xlr microphone cables, Julian Baldwin |
Next by Thread: | Re: cable for long xlr microphone cables, vickipowys |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU