naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SD 7 series recorders with / without a 302

Subject: Re: SD 7 series recorders with / without a 302
From: "Munir kureshi"
Date: Wed Apr 18, 2012 6:30 am ((PDT))
I have been using Sennheiser MKH70/30 and I think they are very quiet. I li=
ke them a lot. I also use Schoeps CMIT5U/CCM4 and I think they sound little=
 quieter and richer. I am sure somebody might disagree on that.
Munir.

Sent from my iPad

On Apr 18, 2012, at 3:33 AM, "Jez" <> wrote:

>
> thanks Andrew,
>
> yes - the GL is discontinued ! Lots of folks have been saying good things=
 about the MIXY recently though, so i'm going to check that out too.
>
> I'm being picky I know but it seems to me that most of the manufacturers =
could be a bit more helpful when it comes to the way the list specs on thei=
r various products - for example the gain rates across the SD range are not=
 listed in the same say or format from model to model.
>
> When it comes to the basic questions I asked, again it seems that the pri=
me use of a mixer for video location shoots gets tons of coverage but the a=
dvantages, or not, of their use for straight audio tend not to get a look i=
n.
>
> leading on from this, do members have some ideas of which mics out there =
have the strongest signal with the least noise ? I've used most of the usua=
l suspects but i'd be interested in knowing if there are any not so obvious=
 ones out there that deliver a hefty level & are quiet in terms of self noi=
se.
>
> ta.
>
> --- In  "andrewrileysound" <=
.> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Munir,
> >
> > The GL is apparently now discontinued so it is all academic but I disag=
ree with your B&H source. The GL offers higher gain, which would solve one =
of my issues with the Nagra units.
> >
> > While the specs are the same for the 7 series and 302/MixPre pre-amps t=
he construction is different, in fact the 788 is different again from the r=
est of the 7 series recorders (in order to solve power issues associated wi=
th having all those pres on board). Subjectively I believe there is a diffe=
rence it's just that it is not necessarily manifested purely in terms of no=
ise. My personal favourite mixer from SD is the old 442 which again has the=
 same pres as the MixPre along with a really good sounding and comprehensiv=
e filter section.
> >
> > Would be interested to know what you make of it all after your demo in =
November.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Andy
> >
> > --- In  Munir kureshi <munirkureshi@> =
wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Jez, Andrew,
> > >
> > > When I ordered Nagra LB from B&H I also ordered Grace Lunatec and the=
 guy suggested against getting GL preamp. He said it would not make any dif=
ference. When I got my SD788t, the distributor discouraged against 302 mixe=
r because the mixer in SD 7 series is as good as 302 mixer. I will the demo=
 of SD when they come to San Francisco in November but it is ways down the =
road. Me too, if SD 302 makes ad difference then I will add it to my system=
.
> > >
> > > Hope there is more information on the subject.
> > >
> > > Munir.
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPad
> > >
> > > On Apr 17, 2012, at 3:26 PM, "andrewrileysound" <pointerzz@> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Jez,
> > > >
> > > > 1) Theoretically you could get an extra 18dB of gain on the line le=
vel output from the 302 but I think they have a slightly lower gain than th=
e pres built into the 7 series recorders. I just did a quick subjective tes=
t using my Mixpre (original issue :) ) into my 744 and I couldn't discern a=
n advantage to the gain staging suggested.
> > > >
> > > > 2) As far as I'm aware they are the same pre-amps as were in the ol=
d Mixpre and are still listed as using Lundahl transformers on the input.
> > > >
> > > > Have you looked at/tried the Grace Lunatec? It would be great to kn=
ow how that compares to the SD stuff, on paper it looks amazing!
> > > >
> > > > Cheers
> > > >
> > > > --- In  "Jez" <tempjez@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I have some simple questions if folks could give me some feedback=
 please. Not sure why i've not got round to doing this kind of comparison b=
efore now - i've had plenty of field mixers on hand over the years !
> > > > >
> > > > > my questions are:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1) do you get any extra gain from attaching a SD 302 mixer to a 7=
 series recorder ? ie. with the same microphones plugged in do you get a hi=
gher level through the 302 into the recorder than you can get just going in=
to the 7 series recorder & is it quieter that way than whacking the gain on=
 the recorder up higher ?
> > > > >
> > > > > 2) are pre-amps / stages in the 302 analogue (like the old mixpre=
) ?
> > > > >
> > > > > i'm looking into adding a field mixer to my kit again & looking a=
t various different models. The SD website has the frustrating habit of not=
 doing like-for-like spec sheets & also, though i've searched all over the =
net, I can't find any reports on this kind of simple test.
> > > > >
> > > > > ta !
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>









<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU