Hi Andrew,
Thank you for the information you provided. I will post my opinion after I =
get to see SD demo in November.
Regards.
Munir.
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 18, 2012, at 1:02 AM, "andrewrileysound" <> wro=
te:
> Hi Munir,
>
> The GL is apparently now discontinued so it is all academic but I disagre=
e with your B&H source. The GL offers higher gain, which would solve one of=
my issues with the Nagra units.
>
> While the specs are the same for the 7 series and 302/MixPre pre-amps the=
construction is different, in fact the 788 is different again from the res=
t of the 7 series recorders (in order to solve power issues associated with=
having all those pres on board). Subjectively I believe there is a differe=
nce it's just that it is not necessarily manifested purely in terms of nois=
e. My personal favourite mixer from SD is the old 442 which again has the s=
ame pres as the MixPre along with a really good sounding and comprehensive =
filter section.
>
> Would be interested to know what you make of it all after your demo in No=
vember.
>
> Cheers
>
> Andy
>
> --- In Munir kureshi <>=
wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jez, Andrew,
> >
> > When I ordered Nagra LB from B&H I also ordered Grace Lunatec and the g=
uy suggested against getting GL preamp. He said it would not make any diffe=
rence. When I got my SD788t, the distributor discouraged against 302 mixer =
because the mixer in SD 7 series is as good as 302 mixer. I will the demo o=
f SD when they come to San Francisco in November but it is ways down the ro=
ad. Me too, if SD 302 makes ad difference then I will add it to my system.
> >
> > Hope there is more information on the subject.
> >
> > Munir.
> >
> > Sent from my iPad
> >
> > On Apr 17, 2012, at 3:26 PM, "andrewrileysound" <> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Jez,
> > >
> > > 1) Theoretically you could get an extra 18dB of gain on the line leve=
l output from the 302 but I think they have a slightly lower gain than the =
pres built into the 7 series recorders. I just did a quick subjective test =
using my Mixpre (original issue :) ) into my 744 and I couldn't discern an =
advantage to the gain staging suggested.
> > >
> > > 2) As far as I'm aware they are the same pre-amps as were in the old =
Mixpre and are still listed as using Lundahl transformers on the input.
> > >
> > > Have you looked at/tried the Grace Lunatec? It would be great to know=
how that compares to the SD stuff, on paper it looks amazing!
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > >
> > > --- In "Jez" <tempjez@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I have some simple questions if folks could give me some feedback p=
lease. Not sure why i've not got round to doing this kind of comparison bef=
ore now - i've had plenty of field mixers on hand over the years !
> > > >
> > > > my questions are:
> > > >
> > > > 1) do you get any extra gain from attaching a SD 302 mixer to a 7 s=
eries recorder ? ie. with the same microphones plugged in do you get a high=
er level through the 302 into the recorder than you can get just going into=
the 7 series recorder & is it quieter that way than whacking the gain on t=
he recorder up higher ?
> > > >
> > > > 2) are pre-amps / stages in the 302 analogue (like the old mixpre) =
?
> > > >
> > > > i'm looking into adding a field mixer to my kit again & looking at =
various different models. The SD website has the frustrating habit of not d=
oing like-for-like spec sheets & also, though i've searched all over the ne=
t, I can't find any reports on this kind of simple test.
> > > >
> > > > ta !
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
|