naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Opinions on AT 4022 Mic and ATI ML200 Pre-Amp

Subject: Re: Opinions on AT 4022 Mic and ATI ML200 Pre-Amp
From: "robin_parmar_sound" robin_parmar_soun=
d
Date: Wed Feb 29, 2012 7:13 pm ((PST))

Fred Bell wrote:

> I would really value opinions on whether this
> would be a successful arrangement for me.  A
> pair of Audio Technica AT4022s connected to an
> ATI ML200 pre-amp (with 48V phantom) then
> connected to a Tascam DR-100 (utilizing the
> line input).

There are a lot of factors. I hope someone with practical experience answer=
s, but until then I will take a stab.

According to Core Sound's website the specs on that pre-amp indicate  an EI=
N of -124dBm across the full bandwidth for the microphone input. (But why a=
re they referencing against a mW?) If we follow Rob Danielson's recommendat=
ion, then the quietest mic to use with this amp would have an EIN of -116dB=
.

The AT4022 are rated at 13 dB(A) self-noise and 19.9 mV/Pa sensitivity. Usi=
ng Rane Note 148, this works out to -113 dBu(A). But if they are like the A=
T 3032 they replaced, then they might do 5dB better in the field. Even in t=
hat case the amp would be well-matched, considering that it's rating is not=
 weighted.

Looking at the other side of the equation, the amp is considerably better t=
han the built-in pre-amps of the DR-100 (original or Mk II). What I can't s=
ay is if there's a better amp choice or if the line input on the recorder h=
as any deficiencies.

-- Robin Parmar







<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU