| Subject: | Re: M10 noise removal, was Sony PCM-M10 vs Zoom H4n best for outdoor |
|---|---|
| From: | "Raimund" animalsounds |
| Date: | Sat Feb 11, 2012 12:51 am ((PST)) |
John Hartog wrote: <if only to better understand the limitations of the PCM-M10 internal mics> Hi John, I disassebled my PCM-M10 and it turned out that the internal mics are obvio= usly slightly modified EM172 capsules having a different source resistor (o= therwise they look the same). So, believe the main limitaions of the intern= al mics is the short distance between them. Regards, Raimund |
| Previous by Date: | Re: M10 noise removal, was Sony PCM-M10 vs Zoom H4n best for outdoor, Peter Shute |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: sppeded up recordings, JVMNATREC@aol.com |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: M10 noise removal, was Sony PCM-M10 vs Zoom H4n best for outdoor, Peter Shute |
| Next by Thread: | Re: M10 noise removal, was Sony PCM-M10 vs Zoom H4n best for outdoor, Avocet |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU