naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: M10 noise removal, was Sony PCM-M10 vs Zoom H4n best for outdoor

Subject: Re: M10 noise removal, was Sony PCM-M10 vs Zoom H4n best for outdoor
From: "hartogj" hartogj
Date: Fri Feb 10, 2012 2:03 pm ((PST))
I am noticing though this discussion a disconnect in the understood meaning=
 of "hiss."

Peter mentioned on his Soundcloud example, the hiss he was concerned with w=
as mostly below 5kHz. To my own ears the problematic microphone hiss noise =
in that recording was most prominent from 8 to 10 kHz.

Even if it is clear that hiss refers to the "s" sound as heard in the word =
"hiss", that sound may fall into different frequency ranges  depending on t=
he frequency response of hearing of the individual listener.  For this reas=
on, when discussing specific cases it may be helpful to describe important =
frequencies or frequency ranges using frequency numbers rather than only su=
bjective terms like "hiss" or "high frequency."

My method of identifying the range of problematic noise in a recording ofte=
n involves a combination of looking at the recording as a spectrogram, and =
listening while sweeping through frequency ranges using a parametric equali=
zer.

John Hartog
rockscallop.org









<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU