Subject: | Re: wind protection options - any firm data? |
---|---|
From: | "Avocet" madl74 |
Date: | Tue Jan 24, 2012 9:54 am ((PST)) |
> The other requirement is that it be as compact as possible, which I > understand (more now) is a contradiction, since it is the air gap > around the mic capsule which does a good deal of the work, > preventing turbulence. Robin, Technically it's the roundness of the exterior which reduces turbulence, but it comes to the same thing. Here's an idea for free for our windgag manufacturers. How about a plastic "Slinky" with end caps which would pack down to a few inches? David David Brinicombe North Devon, UK Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum - Ambrose Bierce |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: wind protection options - any firm data?, Gordon Hempton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: wind protection options - any firm data?, Avocet |
Previous by Thread: | Re: wind protection options - any firm data?, Gordon Hempton |
Next by Thread: | Re: wind protection options - any firm data?, Avocet |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU