Subject: | Re: parabolic mics + recorder noise |
---|---|
From: | "Dan Dugan" dandugan_1999 |
Date: | Tue Jun 14, 2011 2:00 pm ((PDT)) |
> It was Raimund who pointed out that the best results with Olympus > LS10 could be had using the 'low' setting, even if on volume '10'. = > And indeed I have found this to be so. I have compared similar > sounds recorded on 'high' volume 3 and 'low' volume '10' and there is = > less noise with the latter by a noticeable amount. If you were > recording, say, on 'high' volume 5, then the same subject with 'low' > volume 10, then increased the levels of the latter in post, to match > the levels of the former (say by up to 6 dB), there would still be > less noise. > > However if you are wanting to record a bird with a relatively soft > song, say using ME66 gun mic, you are probably better off to go with > 'high' volume 5 to get a fully saturated signal. > > Using Primo EM172 plug-in mics and also ME66 gun mic with my LS10, I > use 'low' volume 10 as my default setting. My experience also, with internal mics or Telinga Clip-Ons. -Dan |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Evening soundscape from Panama, Jose Freitas |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Mic Body Size for Frogloggers BT 172-BI / Windscreen Recommendations, ekrody |
Previous by Thread: | Re: parabolic mics + recorder noise, Raimund |
Next by Thread: | Re: Hello and a question - what recorder, Jan Eerala |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU