| Subject: | Re: Why not use the CAD e100s: 3.7dB(A) hyper-cardioid |
|---|---|
| From: | "Gregory O'Drobinak" gmo_dunes2 |
| Date: | Sun May 29, 2011 8:28 pm ((PDT)) |
Shaya: uh, oh.... you meant the E100S, which does have (supposedly) the 3.7 dBA se= lf noise. I read the model # as having small 's' at the end as a plural of the= mic (my bad old eyes). I still wonder about the supercardiod pattern, though. The price is over $500, so I guess someone needs to be sure & bold enough t= o buy two of the them and try it out in the bush. Let us know how it works! -Greg |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Nature Recordists] Why not use the CAD e100s: 3.7dB(A) hyper-card=, Shaya Weiss |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Nature Recordists] Why not use the CAD e100s: 3.7dB(A), Gregory O'Drobinak |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Why not use the CAD e100s: 3.7dB(A) hyper-cardioid, Gregory O'Drobinak |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Why not use the CAD e100s: 3.7dB(A) hyper-cardioid, Shaya Weiss |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU