Subject: | Re: ultra portable recorder |
---|---|
From: | "Marinos Koutsomichalis" marinoskouts= |
omichalis Date: Mon Apr 11, 2011 6:23 am ((PDT)) but if I use .wav is it ok ?? I also came across some discussions about the low-end of the ls-11 - it is = reported to be somewhat weak or what ? -- Marinos Koutsomichalis Music Research Center, University of York Contemporary Music Research Centre (CMRC) Faculty of Music Technology & Acoustics - TEI of Crete www.marinoskoutsomichalis.com On 11 =CE=91=CF=80=CF=81 2011, at 4:14 =CE=BC.=CE=BC., stancourtney wrote: > One thing to remember with the LS-11 unless you are doing .wav you are li= mited to one 2 gb file, on continuous record, no matter how many gig in you= r memory card. Major flaw! > > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: ultra portable recorder, stancourtney |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: ultra portable recorder, stancourtney |
Previous by Thread: | Re: ultra portable recorder, stancourtney |
Next by Thread: | Re: ultra portable recorder, stancourtney |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU