naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ultra portable recorder

Subject: Re: ultra portable recorder
From: "oryoki2000" oryoki2000
Date: Mon Apr 11, 2011 8:52 am ((PDT))
Marinos Koutsomichalis wrote:

> I also came across some discussions about
> the low-end of the ls-11 - it is reported
> to be somewhat weak or what ?

The story of weak bass begins with the LS-10.  Olympus engineers designed i=
n a bass roll-off to help protect against handling noise and wind noise.  T=
he result is like having a low cut filter that you can't turn off.

There was some criticism of the LS-10 performance, primarily from concert t=
apers who like to rattle the dishes in the kitchen with bass during playbac=
k.

Olympus responded with a different design in the LS-11.  There's a graph of=
 frequency response of the built-in mics in the LS-10 and LS-11 here
http://asia.olympus-imaging.com/products/voice_recorders/linear_pcm/ls11/

Reviewers generally like the LS-11 sound better than the LS-10, using phras=
es like "better balanced" and "much more pleasing."

Olympus continues to work on bass performance in its hand-held recorders.  =
The primary reason Olympus included three mics in the new LS-7 design is to=
 improve bass response.









<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU