Subject: | Re: Introduction of a new member - Expanding the dimension of record |
---|---|
From: | "Dan Dugan" dandugan_1999 |
Date: | Mon Jan 24, 2011 5:28 pm ((PST)) |
> I have used the term 5.1 because it is a common > standard. Since the center channel is for voice, I am not sure that chan= nel > will be needed for nature sounds. For this first test, I may also leave = out > the subwoofer channel because that will take additional programming to ge= t > it operational. Four channels are fine for nature surround. I would only add the center cha= nnel if there was something I wanted to focus on with a directional mic. Fo= rget the Low Frequency Effects channel, that's for loud stuff in movie prod= uction. Most if not all home surround systems cross over the low frequencie= s from the five channels into the system subwoofer, so that will be playing= your lows, anyway. -Dan |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Introduction of a new member - Expanding the dimension of record, Avocet |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Mystery Sound, Neville Recording |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Introduction of a new member - Expanding the dimension of record, Avocet |
Next by Thread: | Tazmanian Devils, Michael Raphael |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU