naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: MHK800 Twin versus MKH30/40

Subject: Re: MHK800 Twin versus MKH30/40
From: "emil klotzsch" onomatopoetik
Date: Mon Sep 6, 2010 11:36 pm ((PDT))
the mkh800 twin is also some kind of XY stereo mic.
remember, XY don=C2=B4t has to be 90 degree, it can also be 180 degree.

Am 04.09.2010 um 00:56 schrieb clay:

> thanks Rob,
>
> I keep forgetting about the side-facing 'feature'.  :)
> thanks for the reminder.
>
> and thanks to Grant as well, I have a 20 that I use with my 30
> occasionally
> as well.  Now I won't feel so 'weird' when I pair an omni with a
> figure-8.
>
> going back to the 800 Twin for a moment, I"m assuming this can
> operate as a
> side facing 'stereo' mic (which much better side noise
> characteristics than
> the MKH418S) so long as I assume mid-side decoding/monitoring?
>
> clay
>
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Rob Danielson <> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> At 10:20 AM -0400 9/3/10, clay wrote:
>>> Rob says:
>>>
>>> "There's the MKH-80/800 which sounds very different from the
>>> MKH-30 to
>>> me in figure 8 mode. Rob D."
>>>
>>> Rob,
>>>
>>> can you share the differences you've heard?
>>>
>>> I've got a 30/40 combo now, and am considering the 800 twin as a
>>> single
>> mike
>>> alternative for mid-side.
>>>
>>> thoughts? anyone?
>>>
>>> thanks much
>>> clay
>>>
>>
>> Hi Clay--
>>
>> I don't own the both of them now so I can do a comparison for you--
>> the only way I really feel comfortable about assessing differences.
>>
>> The biggest difference for my uses (high gain natural ambience) was
>> in the lower midrange clarity 125-500 Hz. IMO, all mics are
>> challenged in this range for distant subject/large spaces. The
>> MKH80's produce more tonality- have a little less tonal
>> simplification (drones) in this range compared the the single capsule
>> mkh's. The 2-3 dB(A) less self-noise is a plus, but not a huge deal.
>> The HF looks better over 10KHz; some report the 80/800's response is
>> less noisy up there.
>>
>> You would not be disappointed with a pair of them but note they are
>> side address mics and cannot be used with flush mounted boundaries
>> and not very well in perp either. They'd probably need vertical
>> mounting if a pair was used in MS. I have a pair of 80's which I've
>> been using in a Jecklin array and gaining some experience with. Aaron
>> Ximm has some 800's I think. Rob D
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
> sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie
> Krause
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>










"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/

<*> Your email settings:
    Digest Email  | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    
    

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

------------------------------------------------------------------------

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU