| Subject: | MHK800 Twin versus MKH30/40 |
|---|---|
| From: | "clay" dan.cesonrocks |
| Date: | Fri Sep 3, 2010 7:20 am ((PDT)) |
Rob says: "There's the MKH-80/800 which sounds very different from the MKH-30 to me in figure 8 mode. Rob D." Rob, can you share the differences you've heard? I've got a 30/40 combo now, and am considering the 800 twin as a single mik= e alternative for mid-side. thoughts? anyone? thanks much clay |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Flammulated Owl, Martyn Stewart |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: MHK800 Twin versus MKH30/40, Rob Danielson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Nature Recordists] SD702T vs Marantz pmd620 oade "super mod" =, Grant Finlay |
| Next by Thread: | Re: MHK800 Twin versus MKH30/40, Rob Danielson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU