naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ORTF Recommendations

Subject: Re: ORTF Recommendations
From: "clay" dan.cesonrocks
Date: Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:51 am ((PDT))
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Marcus Buick <> wrote:

>
>
> [stuff snipped for readability]
>
While M/S is also a coincident technique, the idea of mapping the
> soundfield to a likeable width, is also a different recording style. It=
=92s
> more
> like sound design than accurate capture.
>
>
> ~Marcus
>

Marcus,

Presumably, you're only saying above that (gross) manipulation of the
soundfield post recording is a different recording style?

Your words could be interpreted to mean that you believe M/S (without
subsequent manipulation) is not an "accurate capture", which I would have t=
o
disagree with.

Clay









<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU