Subject: | Re: ORTF Recommendations |
---|---|
From: | "Michael Raphael" |
Date: | Mon Aug 23, 2010 6:18 am ((PDT)) |
I use schoeps all of the time for nature work as well as other things and t= hey are great. The MKH's handle humidity more effectively, but I've never = had a problem. M. On Aug 23, 2010, at 9:03 AM, jtudor2005 wrote: > > > --- In "myles.thompson" <> w= rote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Do you think this Schoepps ORTF set-up would be suitable for wildlife /= nature recording: > > > I'm getting ready to fly interstate, but briefly have a look here. > > http://acousticlight.net/blog/ > > Not 'wildlife' as such, but I've used my CCM4Lgs in ORTF for outdoors wor= k in the Rycote/Schoeps blimp. The second article about ORTF and the 'Who d= oesn't love the sound of trains'. This last one was recorded with ORTF > > I can give some more info later in the week. > > Regards > John > > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: ORTF Recommendations, jtudor2005 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: ORTF Recommendations, Dan Dugan |
Previous by Thread: | Re: ORTF Recommendations, jtudor2005 |
Next by Thread: | Re: ORTF Recommendations, Dan Dugan |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU