| Subject: | Re: M/S recording setup |
|---|---|
| From: | "Marinos Koutsomichalis" marinoskouts= |
omichalis Date: Tue Aug 17, 2010 12:02 am ((PDT)) On 17 =CE=91=CF=85=CE=B3 2010, at 6:20 =CF=80.=CE=BC., James Shatto wrote: > But if you mix to stereo in the field, even though you can derive most of= the non-stereo version in post. You lose resolution by doing do. So your= 44100Hz sample is for all intents 22050Hz once you split it apart. what ? I' m not sure what you mean, but this is totally not true.. m |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: M/S recording setup, Dan Dugan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: M/S recording setup, James Shatto |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: M/S recording setup, Dan Dugan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: M/S recording setup, James Shatto |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU