naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ????????? Microphones ??????????

Subject: Re: ????????? Microphones ??????????
From: "Dan Dugan" dandugan_1999
Date: Sat Aug 14, 2010 11:19 am ((PDT))
> I' d like to think there are 2 different ways to go, generally speaking
>
> the one is to have some ultra-portable recording you can carry with you a=
ll the time - sth like the sony d-50 or similar and use it with its own on-=
board mics. These machines usually have plug-in power jack inputs for exter=
nal microphones
>
> the other is to have a professional machine with good quality preamps wit=
h XLR jacks  and phantom power, plus a set of quality microphones, wind-pro=
tection systems, cables, boom poles, tripods, and whatever else your indivi=
dual needs call for..
>
> A professional field recordist should have at least 2 set-ups. One ultra-=
portable and a really professional one. My experience says not to try mix t=
he two worlds. Most portable recorders do not pair well professional mics a=
nd you need additional adaptors, etc - they are no designed for such a use =
anyway. On the other hand, most professional machines do not pair well cons=
umer electret microphones - you might need adaptors, plug-in power modules =
and they are not designed for such a use anyway as they are more bulky and =
heavy..
>
> I think that there is no middle-way - no machine that will suit both worl=
ds. You can be ultra-portable and that' s really useful sometimes, but you =
won' t have that pro quality in you recordings. You can go the pro way, but=
 you will need a lot of extra cash, a lot of extra knowledge and accuracy -=
 you will have a lot more weight to carry around and all sorts of other nec=
essities -  like a car to move your equipment around, an insurance because =
you don' t want to take risks with it, etc..
>
> so my advice would be to stick with the d-50 or similar and use it as is =
- and if at some point in the future you decide to invest more in good equi=
pment , this will be you secondary ultra-portable set-up,

I concur; this is good advice. But what's exciting about being in audio now=
adays, and what drives all the tech talk on this list, is that the cheap st=
uff keeps getting better. Even today, in the listening room it will be diff=
icult to distinguish a recording made with a pro rig from one made with, sa=
y, a pair of Telinga clip-ons and an Olympus LS-10. Fieldcraft (putting the=
 mics in the right place at the right time) is more important than tech in =
achieving "professional" results. And luck, but that really boils down to, =
like photography, making a lot of shots and picking the good ones.

-Dan





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU