Re: Zoom H4n as a 4-track recorder

naturerecordists

Re: Zoom H4n as a 4-track recorder

Subject:	Re: Zoom H4n as a 4-track recorder
From:	"Paul Jacobson" thebrunswicktwitcher
Date:	Thu May 13, 2010 1:57 pm ((PDT))

There are some comparative tests between H4, H4N, D-50 and R-4 here:

http://www.martin-doppelbauer.de/fieldrecorder/


On 14/05/2010, at 3:12 AM, oryoki2000 wrote:

> "Did anyone do the real-life test"
>
> Yes.  See
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/message/36429

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Zoom H4n as a 4-track recorder, maxfrick78 Re: Zoom H4n as a 4-track recorder, Rob Danielson Re: Zoom H4n as a 4-track recorder, oryoki2000 Re: Zoom H4n as a 4-track recorder, Paul Jacobson <= Re: Zoom H4n as a 4-track recorder, redteamwins Re: Zoom H4n as a 4-track recorder, Jos=C3=A9

Previous by Date:	Re: Zoom H4n caveat, Mark Brennan
Next by Date:	Re: Zoom H4n caveat, Paul Willison
Previous by Thread:	Re: Zoom H4n as a 4-track recorder, oryoki2000
Next by Thread:	Re: Zoom H4n as a 4-track recorder, redteamwins
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU