naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Muriemike and falling snow

Subject: Re: Muriemike and falling snow
From: "Mike Rooke" picnet2
Date: Tue Dec 15, 2009 2:09 pm ((PST))
Hi,
    I think the snow recording is in a very diffuse environment - i checked=
 the cross correlation and there wasnt much to conclude besides the diffuse=
ness :) - Previous recordings Ive heard had a decent center. Ive found a lo=
g spiral array to give the best center and also gives a boost to the crispy=
ness. You could even make it from a box of rice crispies :)

Using matrixing to adjust parallel boundary arrays is shifting the phasing =
around which I think is as intended but it may require quite a processing c=
hain, preeq & mic response balance, matrix, m/s eq, matrix / post eq & secr=
et sauce. - Ideal setup is to ensure the mics are matched and placed so the=
 effects of phase are minimal, which means exactly at the same position eit=
her side of the rig, thats also shaped exactly the same.

I can assist you testing the mic Klas using my mad science if it helps. Im =
enjoying the development and the small changes that are made. Muriemike has=
 a lot of potential.

BR
Mike

--- In  Rob Danielson <> wrote:
>
> At 4:45 PM +0100 12/15/09, Klas Strandberg wrote:
> >
> >
> >The hole is a consequence of the two mikes, boosting HF sideways and
> >can only (...?) be heard (in a bothersome
> >way..?) when you record awidespread "sparkle all
> >around" as when the grain snow hit the frozen
> >leaves in this almost panorama way.
> >
> >A more "common" stereo picture is at the the ending of
> ><http://www.telinga.com/gallery/tripple_birdfeed.mp3>http://www.telinga.=
com/gallery/tripple_birdfeed.mp3
> >where you don=B4t
> >clearly hear the hole, as there are no audible HF getting boosted
> >from the sides. Birds are flying between the feeder and a tree at the
> >left, and I don't hear any bothersome change of wing sounds over the are=
a.
> >I have tried out a prototype where the mic capsules point forward,
> >not to "shade" themselves, but then I loose some of the "crispiness"
> >that I like and that so easily can be filtered, then also reducing
> >some of the mic self noise.
>
> Of course, all stereo arrays have draw-backs and
> one's preference can depend on what one considers
> to be more natural, more striking, more accurate,
> etc.
>
> Some listeners prefer the additional HF contrast
> between the LEFT and RIGHT speakers because it
> gives a sense that the sound horizon has more
> spread. However, even omni mic capsules are
> slightly treble-centric-- the "center" of their
> polar pattern is more sensitive to HF than the
> sides (usually).  When the mic capsules are
> directed out or (opposing) towards the sides, the
> LEFT speaker and RIGHT speaker contrast is
> heightened. In directing both capsules straight
> forward, (oriented perpendicular to a flat
> boundary or tangential to a spherical or curved
> one), the center of the field is rendered with
> more HF emphasis. Moving the capsule diaphragm
> out of the pressure zone tends to simplify the
> "cues" as the capsule is no longer in the
> "pressure zone" that comes with mounting the
> capsule with the diaphragm flush to the boundary.
> There are many opinions about the plusses and
> minus's of capsule orientation. I personally
> feel, given the effects of the options, that
> front-facing capsule orientation is more
> "natural" in that it establishes a "front stage"
> where sounds become symmetrically darker as they
> move towards the sides.  The head-spacing/timing
> differences are preserved and there is plenty of
> LEFT - RIGHT contrast and horizontal spread. (One
> stereo array with flush-mounted capsules that
> seems to be an exception is the SASS.  I've never
> been able to do side-by side comparisons with
> one.)
>
> Creating a HF boost in the center of the stereo
> field has other advantages. Traditional EQ
> affects center and side tonality _at the same
> time_. If one uses standard parametric EQ to
> reduce extra crispness at 4K Hz from hard left
> and hard right, the crispness/tonality of the
> center is also lessened. I think better overall
> side-to-center tonal balance after EQ can be
> achieved with forward-facing capsule orientation.
>
>
> >If "State of the Art" measurements + a good middle is required, only
> >the best M/S system will do and then we enter into another world, you kn=
ow.
> >Still, I must say, - I have heard professional M/S recordings which
> >have been less "alive" than from binaural and semi-binaural set-up's,
> >some M/S has even been "flat".
>
> Some listeners prefer a very EVEN stereo field
> where the sounds are more closely positioned
> across the middle.  Coincident stereo arrays like
> X-Y and M-S can do this (though the later needs
> to be carefully adjusted).  These arrays tend* to
> have less left-right contrast and with the X-Y
> array, sounds can feel bunched together in the
> center. With M-S and X-Y there is no timing
> difference analogous to the spread of the ears
> and no baffle or boundary cues produced as with
> our heads. *Note many recordists that use M-S
> rigs tend to lower the level of the center mic to
> create more left right contrast.
>
> There's another way, in post, to adjust the
> tonality of the Center and the Sides of the
> stereo field separately.  It involves using "plug
> ins" in the mixing chain.  We first discussed
> this technique in this list a year or so ago.
> Here's a screen shot of the chain I've been using:
>
>   https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/type/public/media/MixingChain_EQBetweenM-SP=
lugs.jpg
>
> I've been mixing material generated by a number
> of stereo arrays over the past few weeks and
> sometime this technique works very well and other
> times not. I'm looking for patterns. Rob D.
>
>
> >
> >Best wishes from Klas and a snowy Sweden.
> >
>
>
> --
>
>
>








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU