Subject: | Re: AudioTechnica AT4022 |
---|---|
From: | "Paul Jacobson" thebrunswicktwitcher |
Date: | Tue Nov 17, 2009 2:32 pm ((PST)) |
On 18/11/2009, at 6:13 AM, Robin wrote: > That's the real question, isn't it? AT rates it at exactly the same sensi= tivity but 2dB more noise than the 3032. Since they took the time to repack= age it in their higher line I thought they'd taken notice of the independen= t tests and praise. But their own tests make it a noisier mic? Confusing. U= nless they downgraded the build somehow to save money. On paper the AT4022 is rated at 3db lower self noise (13dB) than published = spec of the AT3032 (16dB). Until someone gets hold of one of these units an= d does real world test we can't make an informed assessment of how the 3032= and 4022 compare. cheers Paul |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: AudioTechnica AT4022, Robin |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: AudioTechnica AT4022, Roger.Norwood |
Previous by Thread: | Re: AudioTechnica AT4022, Robin |
Next by Thread: | Re: AudioTechnica AT4022, Roger.Norwood |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU