Subject: | Re: AudioTechnica AT4022 |
---|---|
From: | "Robin" escalation746 |
Date: | Tue Nov 17, 2009 11:14 am ((PST)) |
oryoki2000 wrote: > Has anyone confirmed that 4022's self noise is similar > to that of the 3032? That's the real question, isn't it? AT rates it at exactly the same sensiti= vity but 2dB more noise than the 3032. Since they took the time to repackag= e it in their higher line I thought they'd taken notice of the independent = tests and praise. But their own tests make it a noisier mic? Confusing. Unl= ess they downgraded the build somehow to save money. -- robin |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: AudioTechnica AT4022, Paul Jacobson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: AudioTechnica AT4022, Paul Jacobson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: AudioTechnica AT4022, Paul Jacobson |
Next by Thread: | Re: AudioTechnica AT4022, Paul Jacobson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU