Subject: | Re: SONY PCM-M10 noise test |
---|---|
From: | "Robin" escalation746 |
Date: | Wed Nov 11, 2009 1:14 pm ((PST)) |
Rob Danielson wrote: > Its neat that it makes super long recordings on the > built-in batteries, accepts common media cards and provides > straight-forward file transferring but the D50 looks to have a > quality edge for quiet location recording as Oryoki surmised. It's a great shame the D50 does not have XLR/phantom, as then its lower noi= se could be matched to some quiet mics without needing yet another device i= n the way. As it is, I prefer to use a proper shoulder unit with XLR and ph= antom power built in, especially as you can get an FR-2LE for cheaper than = D50 plus phantom power box. When using the built-in microphones the M10 has radically better sound than= the D50, according to Sony's own graphs. This was a total shock to me! For= the price it's hard to resist the M10 as a second recorder, one small enou= gh to always carry with you. -- robin |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: battery life of small audio recorders, Kevin Colver |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: SONY PCM-M10 noise test, Rob Danielson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: SONY PCM-M10 noise test, Rob Danielson |
Next by Thread: | Re: SONY PCM-M10 noise test, Rob Danielson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU