Isn't Audacity free?
--- In Martyn Stewart <> wrote:
>
> Raven is more expensive than Audition and works on memory alone, Raven
> has no advantage over Audition. Audition is not "thousands" more than
> Audacity.
> Try to structure your comments a little less misleading.
> Audacity is a good program for beginners for both the Mac & the PC.
> You would never be able to bring in files longer than 5-10 minutes
> into Raven without it sending out messages that demand more memory.
> Raven was basically made for spectral analysis.
> When I bought raven a few years ago t cost $400. Audacity will cost
> you $300.
>
>
>
>
>
> Martyn
> *************************************
> Martyn Stewart
> http://www.naturesound.org
>
> Redmond WA
> 425-898-0462
>
> 47.65420118705451
> -121.98158740997314
>
> Make every garden a wildlife habitat
> **************************************
> Listen to the Birds and the Bees at
> http://naturesound.libsyn.org/
> ------------------------------------------------
> View a Nature Recordists Blog!
>
> http://naturesound.org/nature/Blog/Blog.html
>
> http://naturesound.org/nature/this_weeks_recordings/this_weeks_recordings.html
>
> P please consider the environment before printing this email
>
> On Oct 16, 2009, at 5:31 AM, aaron s wrote:
>
> > Audition has no benefits over Audacity and of course cost thousands
> > of times more considering Audacity is free. If you are going to
> > purchase editing software I recommend Raven from Cornell which can
> > do many things that either of the A programs cant. And it works on
> > mac. There is also a free mac program from Cornell called Canary but
> > it is for OS9 and earlier.
> > Aaron
> >
> > For marimba, mbira, mallets, and hosho.
> >
> > CHECK OUT <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank"
> > href="http://www.custommarimba.com/
> > "><font size="6">www.custommarimba.com</font></a>
> >
> > .
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
|