| Subject: | Re: editing software |
|---|---|
| From: | "Martyn Stewart" mijdog2000 |
| Date: | Fri Oct 16, 2009 7:00 am ((PDT)) |
Raven is more expensive than Audition and works on memory alone, Raven has no advantage over Audition. Audition is not "thousands" more than Audacity. Try to structure your comments a little less misleading. Audacity is a good program for beginners for both the Mac & the PC. You would never be able to bring in files longer than 5-10 minutes into Raven without it sending out messages that demand more memory. Raven was basically made for spectral analysis. When I bought raven a few years ago t cost $400. Audacity will cost you $300. Martyn ************************************* Martyn Stewart http://www.naturesound.org Redmond WA 425-898-0462 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | editing software, aaron s |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: editing software, Thomas Ashcraft |
| Previous by Thread: | editing software, aaron s |
| Next by Thread: | Re: editing software, Thomas Ashcraft |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU