Subject: | Re: editing software |
---|---|
From: | "Rob Danielson" danielson_audio |
Date: | Fri Oct 16, 2009 7:59 am ((PDT)) |
At 5:31 AM -0700 10/16/09, aaron s wrote: > Audition has no benefits over Audacity and of course cost thousands >of times more considering Audacity is free. If you are going to >purchase editing software I recommend Raven from Cornell which can >do many things that either of the A programs cant. And it works on >mac. There is also a free mac program from Cornell called Canary but >it is for OS9 and earlier. >Aaron Hi Aaron-- Considering freeware solutions, Ardour comes closer than Audacity to meeting Lily's requirements, but neither support video for sound editing synchronization. Another feature that quickly distinguishes Audition from Audacity in my mind is the support of real-time plug-ins in multiple tracks. Rob D. -- |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: editing software, Thomas Ashcraft |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: editing software, Steve |
Previous by Thread: | Re: editing software, Thomas Ashcraft |
Next by Thread: | Re: editing software, Steve |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU