Subject: | 2. Re: Speakers for Editing |
---|---|
From: | "Robin Parmar" escalation746 |
Date: | Thu Mar 26, 2009 2:44 am ((PDT)) |
> Certainly, for my purposes there is usually nothing of > value below 40Hz. Apart from being mostly man-related > rumble, most listeners can't reproduce it properly > anyway and, even if they can, won't notice it missing. > So I usually get rid of that stuff without a second > thought... But I'll always use a linear-phase filter > with a very steep slope, so there is no obvious LF roll-off. Makes good sense to me. I generally do this early in the mix process, since= summing tracks with high energy low frequency sound can reduce your headro= om and play havoc with other processing (compression etc.). Of course here = I'm thinking most of electroacoustic recordings or soundscape composition r= ather than pure phonography, where mixing and processing would generally be= more minimal. -- robin |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | 1. Re: Speakers for Editing, Greg Simmons |
---|---|
Next by Date: | 3. Re: Speakers for Editing, Rob Danielson |
Previous by Thread: | 2. Re: Speakers for Editing, Graham Evans |
Next by Thread: | 2. Re: Speakers for Editing, escalation746 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU