naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Olympus LS-10 reviews

Subject: Re: Olympus LS-10 reviews
From: "Rob Danielson" danielson_audio
Date: Wed Jul 2, 2008 1:24 am ((PDT))
At 7:32 PM -0600 7/1/08, Kevin Colver wrote:
>There's no substitute for a well placed microphone. Here is the art
>of our avocation. That said, place the best mics you can get and
>record into the best equipment you can obtain. Then, enjoy.
>
>Kevin
>

This is very true. Working with fixed mics takes a lot of the fun out
of recording for me. The stereo arrays in the point and shoot
recorders are not  "X-Y" because they not coincident, they're not
"ORTF" or "Spaced A/B" because the distance between the capsules is
too close.  The arrays seem best suited for close-micing effects and
acoustic instruments.  After trying to make engaging stereo
recordings with the coincident X-Y array employed in Rode NT-4 mics,
the students, themselves, insisted on making rigs with more effective
stereo imaging.

The "best," comparably-priced start-up systems are rarely hot, new items.

For me, "critical recording" includes the joy of thinking through all
of the options. Tools that make a number of key decisions for me have
less to offer.  Rob D.
--




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU