| Subject: | Re: [gear] MKH 8040 sample comparison (raw files) |
|---|---|
| From: | "Greg Weddig" gweddig |
| Date: | Thu May 1, 2008 7:36 pm ((PDT)) |
Point taken, Here are the two samples , previously posted, without any changes, no eq, no normalization. Schoeps MK21 SD 744t: http://gregweddig.net/prettyboy/Schoeps_mk21_ortf_2496_sample_raw.wav or http://tinyurl.com/3ek5as ~~~~~~ Sennheiser MKH 8040, Grace Lunatec V3, SF 744t http://gregweddig.net/prettyboy/sennheiser_8040_ortf_2496_sample_raw.wav or http://tinyurl.com/4c3qmd --greg weddig Baltimore, MD http://gregweddig.net --- In Rob Danielson <> wrote: > > At 3:29 PM +0000 5/1/08, Greg Weddig wrote: > > > Bottom end is rolled off starting at about 250Hz. > > A real gradual curve? There could be differences in response and > impact on sound quality under 250 Hz that would be good to know about > before purchase. So fussy, Rob D. > > > > > -- > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [gear] MKH 8040 sample comparison, Rob Danielson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Hard Disk recording at higher elevations, Volker Widmann |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Hi-MD "bottoming-out" (was Plug In Power), Andrew Carter |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [gear] MKH 8040 sample comparison (raw files), Curt Olson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU